Produced By Global Insight Conferences – 16 Years of Unquestionable Quality
Floating Offshore Wind Conference
Floating Offshore Wind Conference
Floating Offshore Wind Conference
Floating Offshore Wind Conference
Floating Offshore Wind Conference
Floating Offshore Wind Conference

From Pilot Projects To Bankable, Deliverable Portfolios: Supply Chain, Finance & Engineering Solutions To Deliver Floating & Deepwater Offshore Wind At Scale

One-Day, Industry-Led, Peer-Reviewed Conference & Networking Event

4th Annual 2 March 2027 The Grand Connaught Rooms  –  London, UK

THEME FOCUS ONE: DELIVERING AT SCALE, SUPPLY CHAIN, FINANCE & POLICY

09:00 Chair’s Opening Remarks

Illiana Cardenes, Director of Strategic Interventions & Partnerships, GBE

PANEL 

09:10 Scale The Supply Chain for Floating & Deepwater Wind

  • Port and dry storage capacity remains the primary constraint on assembling floating structures and deepwater foundations at scale
  • Examine the balance between local commitments and globally-competitive sourcing for large steel and concrete components
  • Consider how ports can secure long-term investment certainty against short-notice project orders
  • Compare the standardised jacket and monopile approach used in deepwater with the near mass production assembly floating structures require

Anders Nordberg, Head of Offshore Wind, Innovation Norway

Michelle Quinn, Director of Offshore Wind, Scottish Government

Ivar Slengesol, Steering Committee Chair, Norwegian Offshore Wind

Knut Vassbotn, CEO Deep Wind Offshore, Deep Wind Offshore

Claire Stjernfalt, Senior Contract Manager, Vårgrønn

PANEL | FINANCING FLOATING & DEEPWATER WIND

09:40 Establish what Investors & Insurers Actually Require Today To Ensure Bankability & Risk Mitigation

  • Floating projects remain difficult to finance and insure while the technology is unproven at scale… so, how do we scale?
  • Early and transparent risk sharing between developers, suppliers and lenders
  • Consider what a genuine track record of completed projects would need to look like before banks treat either technology as an established asset class

Berna Meric Pekkaya, Senior Director, Project & Infrastructure Finance, ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Thomas Fureder, Managing Director, Barclays

Tory Harud, Commercial Strategy Director, Marine, The Crown Estate

Georgios Kalpias, Director | Infrastructure Finance, HSBC

10:10 Bonus Session: Reserved for Conference Partner

PANEL | CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE, POLICY REFORM & THE CASE FOR A DEEPWATER CATEGORY

10:25 Understand How Government Support Mechanisms are Evolving to Reflect Floating & Deepwater Wind as Distinct Technologies

  • Contracts for Difference need to evolve to support floating specifically, including how reformed national pricing interacts with the existing auction model
  • How is the UK’s new deepwater category within the CfD framework still being tested and understood by developers?
  • Will the Government give a clear signal on pipeline and budget commitment following limited floating allocation in recent auction rounds?
  • Assess whether the Strategic Spatial Energy Plan will formally include current Scotland pipeline projects

Paul Lennon, Head of Asset Development, ESB

Neils Anger, Head of EU Energy Policy , Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy

Chris Fox, Head of Policy & Regulation, UK Power, Equinor

10:55 Morning Refreshments & Informal Networking

THEME TWO: ENGINEERING THE NEXT GENERATION, TECHNOLOGY, STANDARDISATION & INSTALLATION

HOW MANY PROVEN DESIGNS DOES THIS INDUSTRY ACTUALLY NEED

11:25 Weigh The Case For Standardisation Against The Risk Of Losing Genuinely Better Emerging Technology

  • Between roughly twenty and over one hundred and fifty competing floating and foundation concepts are currently in development…how should we narrow this down?
  • Is a neutral technical body such as a classification society better placed to assess competing concepts than any single design house?
  • Consider whether the same proliferation of concepts is beginning to affect deepwater hybrid foundations
  • industry should converge on to bring costs down

Hakon Opsund, Business Development Manager, Hitachi

DOUBLE PERSPECTIVE | FOUNDATIONS, MOORING & INSTALLATION BELOW THE WATERLINE

11:45 Address the Engineering Questions beneath Both Floating & Deepwater Wind That Remain Genuinely Unresolved

  • The Achilles heel? Mooring and anchoring technology has received a fraction of the investment directed toward floating and foundation concepts
  • Dynamic export cables remain one of the least proven elements of the floating wind system, and so one of the biggest risks?
  • Exploring how deepwater foundations require subsea engineering, geotechnical assessment and installation methodology distinct from both standard fixed bottom and floating practice
  • Compare installation sequencing and risk across both technologies

Filipe Aguiar, Foundations Engineer, Sumit Renewable Power GMbH

Edward Unwin, Lead Offshore Engineer, Buchan Offshore Wind

12:25 Bonus Session: Reserved for Conference Partner

VESSELS & MAJOR COMPONENT REPLACEMENT: AN HONEST ACCOUNT

12:40 Learn From A Vessel Strategy That Did Not Quite Go to Plan Before Committing Capital to your Own

  • No proven, bankable method yet exists for replacing major components on a floating turbine at scale. So what are our options now?
  • Existing vessels built for fixed bottom or oil and gas cannot simply be redeployed without further investment
  • Hear a candid account of where a vessel or component replacement strategy fell short and what it actually costs to correct

Isabel DiVanna, Associate Director, The Carbon Trust

13:00 Networking Lunch for Delegates, Speakers & Partners

LUNCHTIME DISCUSSIONS

13:25 Facilitated Peer-to-Peer Lunchtime Discussions:

A) AI & Digital Technology:
Establish where artificial intelligence already has genuine evidence of use in offshore wind operations

B) Workforce & Skills
Address the long lead time required to build the workforce capable of delivering 2030s projects

C) Environmental Impact, Sustainability & Diversity
Balancing speed and genuine environmental protection

D) Geopolitics, Trade & Energy Security
Consider how tariffs, trade tension, and energy security are reshaping investment decisions

E) Decommissioning, Circularity & Recoverability
Discuss designing for end-of-life recovery from the outset of a project

F) Grid Connection & Hybrid Interconnectors
Clarify what hybrid infrastructure actually means across floating and deepwater contexts

G) Community Engagement & Social Licence
Examine how to secure and maintain public confidence

THEME THREE: ONE SECTOR, TWO TECHNOLOGIES, TURBINES, CONSENTING & THE PATH AHEAD

14:00 Afternoon Chair’s Opening Remarks

Jasna Culic- Viskota, Head of Transactions – Offshore Wind, BayWa r.e.

FIRESIDE CHAT | FLOATING & DEEPWATER WIND: ONE SECTOR, TWO TECHNOLOGIES OR GENUINE COMPETITORS

14:10 Resolve Where Each Technology Fits & Whether The Industry Should Be Planning For Both Together

  • A live example, currently under joint venture assessment, illustrates how a single site can move between deepwater fixed and floating classification
  • Consider whether floating and deepwater compete for the same sites or serve genuinely different parts of the resource
  • Vote live on whether the industry should plan floating and deepwater as one connected technology pathway or two separate ones

David Kennlyside, Engineering Director, Cierco

Amy Parry, Deputy Portfolio Director, Nadara

14:40 Bonus Session: Reserved for Conference Partner

SESSION | TURBINE SUPPLY & THE OEM BOTTLENECK

14:55 Understand Who Will Actually Manufacture Turbines For Floating & Deepwater Wind Over The Next Decade

  • With only one or two European turbine manufacturers are currently willing to develop turbines specifically for floating applications, how will we resolve the bottleneck?
  • The exclusion of certain manufacturers on national security grounds has removed an option without yet establishing a clear alternative roadmap
  • Consider whether deepwater hybrid foundations can draw on a wider and more established turbine supply chain than floating currently can
  • Discuss what a realistic timeline for resolving this bottleneck actually looks like

PANEL | CONSENTING, PLANNING & THE STRATEGIC SPATIAL ENERGY PLAN

15:15 Navigate The Environmental & Regulatory Pathway For Floating & Deepwater Projects Alike

  • Environmental impact assessment and habitats directive processes need integration that does not compromise genuine environmental protection
  • Planning consents require flexibility to accommodate improved technology emerging between submission and determination
  • Consider whether deepwater sites benefit from a faster consenting precedent given fixed bottom’s more established regulatory history
  • Examine what the Strategic Spatial Energy Plan will mean in practice for live projects

15:45 Afternoon Refreshments & Informal Networking

16:15 Bonus Session: Reserved for Conference Partner

SESSION | FROM PILOTS TO PORTFOLIOS

16:30 Chart What it Will Actually Take to Move Both Technologies From Demonstration to Deliverable, Bankable Portfolios

  • Draw together the supply chain, financing and engineering questions raised throughout the day into a single forward view
  • Consider what evidence investors and government will need to see before either technology is treated as an established asset class
  • Close with a realistic assessment of the pathway from today’s pilot projects to tomorrow’s commercial portfolios

Per Lund, CEO, Odfjell Oceanwind

16:50 Chair’s Closing Remarks